Threat Intelligence Plus
Most threat intelligence is a firehose nobody drinks from. The value is in what gets left out.
Threat Intelligence Plus is curated by one of the largest commercial security operations centres in the world, drawn from real attacks, emerging threats, and observed adversary behavior across a very large customer base. Not aggregated feeds, but findings from incidents that genuinely happened to organizations like yours.
The problem is rarely a shortage of threat data
Free and commercial feeds are abundant. What organizations lack is the capacity to work out which of it applies to them, and the analyst time to turn a general warning into a specific change. Intelligence that does not lead to a decision is an expensive newsletter.
Volume without relevance
A feed reporting every campaign worldwide tells a mid-sized business almost nothing actionable. The signal about their sector and their software is buried in everything else.
Indicators that expire quickly
Lists of malicious addresses and hashes age rapidly. Attackers change infrastructure routinely, which is why behavior is more durable than indicators.
Nobody to interpret it
Raw intelligence assumes an analyst who can translate it into a control change. Most organizations do not have that person, so the feed accumulates unread.
Intelligence produced as a by-product of defending people
Arctic Wolf sees attacks because it is actively defending a very large number of organizations. That vantage point produces something a research team assembling public sources cannot: knowledge of what is being attempted right now, against businesses of a particular size and sector.
Curated rather than aggregated
Analysts decide what is worth passing on, which is the step most intelligence products skip because filtering is expensive and volume looks impressive. A shorter, relevant set of findings is more useful than a comprehensive one nobody reads.
Observed adversary behavior
How attackers are actually operating: the techniques, the sequences, and the tooling seen in real incidents. Behavior remains useful long after specific indicators have been rotated away.
Emerging threats early
A campaign appearing across the customer base is visible quickly, which means a technique used against one organization this morning can inform everyone else's defenses the same day.
Reporting for different audiences
Findings written to be usable by a technical team and separately by a board or risk committee, which are genuinely different documents with different purposes.
Feeds into the operation
The same intelligence informs Arctic Wolf's own detection and threat hunting, so it is not a separate product bolted alongside the security operation but part of how it works.
Sector and scale context
What is being aimed at organizations resembling yours, which is far more actionable than a global summary that averages across everyone.
Intelligence earns its place when it changes a decision
These are the uses that justify the cost. If none of them apply to your organization, this is probably not the right thing to buy yet.
Prioritizing what to fix first
Knowing which vulnerabilities are being actively exploited against your sector turns a long remediation list into a defensible order of work.
Justifying security spend
Concrete evidence of what is happening to comparable organizations is considerably more persuasive to a board than a general appeal to risk.
Tuning your own defenses
If you run your own detection, knowing current adversary techniques lets you write rules for what is actually being attempted rather than what is theoretically possible.
Briefing leadership credibly
Regular reporting grounded in observed activity, rather than headlines, gives a risk committee something they can reason about.
Preparing for sector-specific pressure
When a campaign begins targeting your industry, early awareness is the difference between preparing and reacting.
Supporting incident work
Recognizing an adversary's known pattern during an investigation shortens it considerably, because you know what else to look for.
This one deserves the most scrutiny
Threat intelligence is the easiest security purchase to make and the easiest to waste. It only produces value where someone acts on it.
Likely a strong fit if
- You have someone who will read it and change something as a result
- You operate in a sector that is deliberately targeted
- You run your own detection and want to tune it against current techniques
- You need to brief a board or risk committee with evidence rather than assertion
- Regulatory or contractual obligations require documented threat awareness
- You are already prioritizing remediation and want better ordering
Start elsewhere if
- Nobody would have time to act on it, in which case buy monitoring instead
- You have unpatched systems and no vulnerability programme, which is more urgent
- You have no detection capability for intelligence to inform
- You want protection rather than information, which is what MDR provides
Intelligence is only worth what gets done with it
This is the solution most likely to be bought and then ignored. A well-written report describing a campaign against your sector changes nothing on its own. Someone has to read it, decide whether it applies here, and then alter a configuration, a rule, a patch priority, or a process.
Arctic Wolf produces the intelligence
Curation by analysts from attacks observed across a very large customer base, covering adversary behavior, emerging campaigns, and sector-specific activity.
NYN Impact converts it into action
The translation step, which is where the value is created and where most intelligence subscriptions quietly fail.
- Deciding which findings genuinely apply to your environment
- Turning a described technique into a configuration or rule change
- Re-ordering remediation work when a vulnerability starts being exploited
- Translating technical reporting into something leadership can act on
- Making sure it gets read on a cadence rather than accumulating
- Being honest when a finding does not warrant any change at all
Fewer findings, drawn from real attacks
Threat Intelligence Plus is curated by one of the largest commercial security operations centres from attacks genuinely observed across its customer base, covering adversary behavior, emerging campaigns, and activity aimed at organizations like yours. It is filtered rather than comprehensive, focused on durable behavior rather than expiring indicators, and reported in forms suited to both a technical team and a board.
Get in touch with NYN Impact
Questions about this solution? Reach us directly.